from www.waterfuelcell.org
see also It Runs On Water Video Documentary
Imagine
running your car on water! That's correct, I said water.
Stanley Meyer may have done exactly that, modifying his dune buggy to run on water alone using the hydrogen to run his dune buggy.
I personally believe in the concept see more here but maybe there is still a element of doubt if he really achieved what he said in running his car using the Water Fuel Cell. He may have thought he had something and just wanted to source more funds so he could fulfill his dream? You have just got to keep a open mind! I still believe In the concept 100% and I believe as I think Stanley did that this will revolutionize the world in using Voltage (Potential Energy) to disassociate the water molecule.
Have you ever thought about water as a fuel source?
The atomic make up of water makes the molecule perfect for a fuel source. The water molecule is composed of two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen. When the water molecule is separated into its component atoms (H and O) and oxidized as fuel, the resulting energy is two and one half times more powerful than gasoline. The byproduct of the combustion is water vapor. Making water as a fuel, powerful and pollution free!
The problem has always been how to separate water economically. Traditional methods of separating the bond of the water molecule have resulted in failure. To power a car by these methods would not move the car very far. The car’s electrical system could not recharge from the process quickly enough. The result would be a quickly drained battery. For many years Stanley Meyer researched this problem and found a way around it!
There are many people, as you could well imagine, who would not like to see this technology appear in the market place.
Stanley A. Meyer died on March 27 1998 at the young age of 57. It is vital that his research and resulting technological advances are not lost, but rather that his work is continued.
THE CELL
The water fuel cell is a perpetual motion device that was supposed to function by breaking water into hydrogen and oxygen gases using less energy than that present in the bond itself. The water fuel cell was claimed to produce several times more energy than it consumed (for instance, by connecting it to an engine that would burn the hydrogen back into water), and a car prototype powered by a water fuel cell was assembled.
Meyer has demonstrated his fuel cell device before Professor Michael Laughton, Dean of Engineering at Mary College, London, Admiral Sir Anthony Griffin, a former controller of the British Navy, and Dr Keith Hindley, a UK research chemist. According to the witnesses, the most startling aspect of the Meyer cell was that it remained cold, even after hours of gas production as his system appeared to operate on mere milliamperes, rather than the amperes that conventional electrolysis would require. The witnesses also stated:
"After hours of discussion between ourselves, we concluded that Stan Meyer did appear to have discovered an entirely new method for splitting water which showed few of the characteristics of classical electrolysis. Confirmation that his devices actually do work come from his collection of granted US patents on various parts of the WFC system. Since they were granted under Section 101 by the US Patent Office, the hardware involved in the patents has been examined experimentally by US Patent Office experts and their seconded experts and all the claims have been established."
Water fueled Car
It Runs on Water is a video with Stanley Meyer demonstrating the water fuel cell in a car. Meyer claimed that he could run a 1.6 liter Volkswagen Dune Buggy on water instead of gasoline. He replaced the spark plugs with "injectors" to spray a fine mist into the engine cylinders, which he claimed were electrified at a resonant frequency. The fuel cell would split water into hydrogen and oxygen gas, which would combust back into water vapor in a conventional hydrogen engine to produce net energy. Estimates made showed that only 22 US gallons (83 L) of water were required to travel from one US coast to the other. Meyer also demonstrated his vehicle for his city's local news station Action 6 News. A video of the buggie in action can be found here.
Fraud charges
It failed to work during a required demonstration of the water-fueled car in a 1990 court case. An Ohio court found Stanley Meyer guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" in a case brought against him by disgruntled investors. The court decided that the centerpiece of the car, his water fuel cell, was a conventional electrolysis device, and he was ordered to repay the investors $25,000.
However, in their 1 December 1996 issue , the London Sunday Times published an article entitled "End of Road for Car that Ran on Water" by Tony Edwards. It upheld the court case, stating that three "Expert Witnesses" were not impressed and decided that the WFC was simply using conventional electrolysis. It stated Stan Meyer was found guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" and was ordered to repay the investors their $25,000. It implied that Michael Laughton, professor of electrical engineering at Queen Mary and Westfield University, London was due to examine the car, but was not allowed to see it. However, not mentioned was that this occurred in 1990 and that the WFC Water Fuel injector tech-base was still under U.S. National Security Review as in accordance to U.S. Patent Law and not available for public viewing. Also not mentioned were the many WFC Patents, verified laboratory and university testing that supports the bases of WFC technology nor the WFC appeal filing to dismiss Judge Corzine ruling due to Judicial default and other relevant information.
On
18 October 1995, a pretrial deposition hearing to
inspect the WFC Dealership demonstration units
(Variable-plate Electrical Polarization Process (VIC)
Fuel Cell and Rotary Pulse Voltage Frequecy Generator
Tubular-Array Fuel Cell) was held in the office of the
plaintiff's attorney, Robert Judkins. Present were the
plaintiff's, their attorneys, plaintiffs expert witness,
Michael Leverich (Electronics Engineer), Stan Meyer, Dr.
Russel Fowler, WFC witness and defense attorneys Judge
Roger Hurley and James Detling, as well as a deposition
recorder. During the deposition, Attorney Judkins
attempted to have the WFC dismantled prior to
implementing proper test procedures, which Stan Meyer
refused. Michael Leverich confirmed that his initial
measurements of the WFC Fuel Cells showed that it
operated exactly as the WFC documentation stated it
should, as so recorded on WFC Deposition Video Tape.
However, he then added a unknown white substance
(powder) for additional testing. Stan objected to this,
since the WFC Fuel Cell uses plain tap water and does
not require a chemical additive. The plaintiffs also
admitted that, during their observances at WFC Dealship
Seminars, tap water was always used without any
chemicals added to the water. Despite Stan's objection,
plaintiff measurements were taken of this chemicallized
water-bath and recorded. This illegal act of tampering
with WFC Evidence of Records was witnessed by WFC
Cameraman, Dr. Russ Fowler, and all others who attended
Plaintiffs Deposition To-Test.
In 1996, Stan Meyer gave oral testimony before the court demonstrating the WFC Fuel Cell "Mode of Operability" by using the Voltage Intensifier Circuit (VIC) to produce voltage of opposite polarity to separate and disassociate the water molecule into its component gases, hydrogen & oxygen. However, the court audio sound recording equipment seemed to malfunction and was switched off. Judge Corzine said proceedings should continue without it. This was a violation of judicial protocol, since the recording system is used to verify testimony given during the trial and as such becomes "Evidence of Records." After his oral testimony, Stan expected Attorney/Judge Hurley to start bringing forth WFC witnesses and counter arguements. Instead, Attorney/Judge Hurley spoke up, stated he had to leave for a pre-planned vacation and said that there was no more testimony to be given and waived the right of the defendant to give a case summary of the WFC facts brought before the court. Stan Meyer immediately stated he would protest and Judge Corzine ended the hearing. Stan wrote a "Request to Retract" fax-letter to the Sunday Times on 2 December 1996. He attached WFC documentation on the filing with the Disciplinary Counsel. He further stated that Judge Corzine had no right to turn off the court audio sound recording equipment, nor to rule against U.S. Patents, or overrule Government and University lab reports in the public domain concerning the mode of operability of the WFC Technology. Furthermore, Stan pointed out that no US Federal "Cease and Desist" order has ever been issued against WFC since the WFC Technology has been fully legalized under US Patent Security Law 35 USC 101 and other US Federal regulatory Acts. His final statement was that "WFC is here to stay" in contradiction to the Sunday Times statement.
Patents
Stanley Meyer
*: Process and apparatus for the production of fuel gas and the enhanced release of thermal energy from such gas
*: Method for the production of a fuel gas
*: Controlled process for the production of thermal energy from gases and apparatus useful therefore
*: Gas generator voltage control circuit
*: Electrical pulse generator
*: Gas electrical hydrogen generator
*: Start-up/shut-down for a hydrogen gas burner
*: Hydrogen gas burner
*: Hydrogen gas injector system for internal combustion engine
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.
NOTE TO AUTHORS: If you are the author or owner of an article or video that I have made available through THEINFOVAULT.NET and you do not wish to have your article or video posted on theinfovault, please contact me and I will remove the item.